Why charity applications get sent back

The Commission can ask questions, return an application, decline to consider it, or reject it.

OutcomeWhenWhat you do
QuestionsThe Commission needs more information or clarificationAnswer them fully
ReturnedThe application is unclear or incomplete, or there isn't enough to decide whether you're a charityFix it and resubmit
Not consideredThe organisation isn't required to register, except in special circumstancesCheck the rules. A non-CIO under £5,000 annual income can apply to HMRC for tax recognition instead
RejectedThe organisation isn't set up as a charityReapply once the reasons are dealt with, ask for a review, or appeal to the Charity Tribunal

A successful application can also come with conditions: actions the trustees must take, which the Commission may check after registration.

The six examples the Commission gives

CC21b lists these as reasons it may ask for more information or clarification. The "looks like" lines are illustrations, not Commission wording.

1. Questions not fully answered

Looks like: "We will help local people." Relevant questions left unanswered.

Fix: answer each relevant question fully, with the specifics of your plans: who, where, how often, how it's paid for. The questions explained.

2. Not using a model or approved governing document

Looks like: a borrowed constitution that doesn't fit your organisation, or model changes made without following the notes.

Fix: use a model or approved governing document. A CIO must follow the Commission's model as closely as circumstances allow: follow each clause's notes on what to keep, omit or amend, fill every blank, and check numbering and cross-references. If you change model wording, say what and why.

3. Purposes not clear, or not explained

Looks like: "to promote good causes" (the Commission's own example of vague wording), or "to benefit the community" on its own. Or clear purposes with no account of how you'll carry them out.

Fix: state the charitable outcome. Add who benefits, where and how, where needed. Then describe the activities that deliver it. Writing purposes.

4. Public benefit not fully explained

Looks like: benefits limited to members or another group with no reason given; fees that poorer people can't afford, with no plan for them.

Fix: say who can benefit and why that group suits the purpose. Explain any limits on access. If charges are more than the poor can afford, say how they'll still benefit. Public benefit.

5. Generic text, including AI-written text

Looks like: paragraphs that could describe any charity. "We are committed to making a positive impact on our community through a range of initiatives."

Fix: the Commission names text "generated through AI tools" that isn't specific to the charity, whether you or an adviser wrote it. Describe your own plans in specific terms.

6. New or unusual purposes

They may prompt questions and need closer consideration. Allow extra time.

What the 48-hour check looks at

This is the first assessment, not the decision.

Before you press submit

Check a draft purpose